home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0131>
- <title>
- Jan. 20, 1992: Making the Best Choice
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Jan. 20, 1992 Why Are Men and Women Different?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- MEDICINE, Page 40
- Making the Best Choice
- </hdr><body>
- <p> Last week's FDA decision sharply reduces the options for
- women seeking to augment or rebuild their breasts. Not only were
- silicone-gel devices easy to insert but their look and feel best
- approximated the real thing. For 90% of womthey were the method
- of choice. While implants inflated with salt water are still
- available and considered safe (if they leak, the saline does no
- harm), they have drawbacks. They can shift as a woman moves, and
- the water may settle into the lower portion of the breast,
- stretching and tightening the skin. They are not recommended for
- thin women or for those who have undergone mastectomy, since
- these women do not have enough extra padding to support the
- viscous envelope.
- </p>
- <p> A second alternative is surgical: rebuilding the breast
- with tissue taken from the stomach or buttocks. But this
- involves a lengthy and costly operation and is appropriate only
- for women who have usable tissue to spare.
- </p>
- <p> Women might be best advised to make do with what they have
- or wait until more choices are available. One implant being
- tested is filled with peanut oil, which, unlike silicone, does
- not interfere with mammograms. With a multimillion-dollar
- industry at stake, manufacturers are under the gun to offer
- alternatives.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-